 Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
				Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion		
	
	×
	Poll: Possible fixes for Pentex Subversion (was ended 0000-00-00 00:00:00)
| Total number of voters: 0 | |||
| Only registered users can participate to this poll | 
			
	
						24 Jun 2012 01:58				#32433
		by KevinM
	
	
		
			
					
Kevin M., Prince of Las Vegas
"Know your enemy and know yourself; in one-thousand battles
you shall never be in peril." -- Sun Tzu, *The Art of War*
"Contentment...Complacency...Catastrophe!" -- Joseph Chevalier
Please visit VTESville daily! vtesville.myminicity.com/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/groups/129744447064017
					
	
			
			 		
													
		
	
				Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion was created by KevinM			
			
				(This list not meant to be all-encompassing.)
Please list your reasoning below. I'm curious as to what everyone's thoughts might be.
							Please list your reasoning below. I'm curious as to what everyone's thoughts might be.
Kevin M., Prince of Las Vegas
"Know your enemy and know yourself; in one-thousand battles
you shall never be in peril." -- Sun Tzu, *The Art of War*
"Contentment...Complacency...Catastrophe!" -- Joseph Chevalier
Please visit VTESville daily! vtesville.myminicity.com/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/groups/129744447064017
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
			
	
						24 Jun 2012 02:03				#32434
		by Pullen
	
	
		
			
					
					



 
				
					
	
			
			 		
													
		
	
				Replied by Pullen on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion			
			
				Im against errata, ban it or leave it be.			
							



 
				Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
			
	
						24 Jun 2012 02:24				#32435
		by Juggernaut1981
	
	
		
			
					
					



 Retired Baron of Sydney, Australia, 418
 Retired Baron of Sydney, Australia, 418
				
					
	
			
			 		
													
		
				Replied by Juggernaut1981 on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion			
			
				I think that the minion with Pentex should be able to act to remove it.  I still think it is potentially too powerful, but I think that adding this option would mean that Star Decks would be less neutered by Pentex.			
							



 Retired Baron of Sydney, Australia, 418
 Retired Baron of Sydney, Australia, 418
				Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Juggernaut1981
- 
				  
- Offline
- Antediluvian
- 
				  
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 2377
- Thank you received: 327
			
	
						24 Jun 2012 03:07				#32436
		by DeathInABottle
	
	
		
			
	
			
			 		
													
		
				Replied by DeathInABottle on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion			
			
				It`s often in the interests of others cross table to remove it, so I`m fine with it as is.			
					Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DeathInABottle
- 
				  
- Offline
- Methuselah
- 
				  
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 284
- Thank you received: 54
			
	
						24 Jun 2012 03:24				#32437
		by Dorrinal
	
	
		
	
	
			 		
													
		
	
		The following user(s) said Thank You: Pendargon 	
			Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
			
	
						24 Jun 2012 03:35				#32438
		by rehlow
	
	
		
			
	
			
			 		
													
		
	
				Replied by rehlow on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion			
			
				I like once per game. It can still be used for a VP lunge if you get to play yours first. Star vampire decks that used to play one defensively (to contest) can now hope to play theirs first or one Sudden solves all problems. Also, once per game might mean someone plays it early to play it first and it is less effective, toning down its power level.			
					Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
		Time to create page: 0.110 seconds	
- You are here:
- 
											Home
					
											
							  
- 
											Forum
					
											
							  
- 
											V:TES Discussion
					
											
							  
- 
											Polling forum
					
											
							  
- Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
 
											 
						
 
			

