On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".
24 Nov 2011 16:41 #15807
by Wedge
Replied by Wedge on topic Re: On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".
It's perfectly true, but all in all I don't really see a way the 5-pool gain is used to oust your prey. It's a defensive mecanism that happen to be doable on your ally, juste like you can use the same parity shift to do 5 damage to your predator if you need to force him to the defensive.
Or have I misunderstood ?[/quote]
Is 5 pool damage insignificant?
Or have I misunderstood ?[/quote]
Is 5 pool damage insignificant?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
26 Nov 2011 19:11 - 27 Nov 2011 08:33 #16069
by Joscha
Baron of Frankfurt
Replied by Joscha on topic Re: On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".
To sum up the different suggestions to nerf the card I come up with this poll. Please tell me if something's missing.
a) Card is fine as it is.
b) Change X pool to X-1 pool (X=number of Meths).
c) Set X to 3 (or less).
d) Make it playable once per Meth.
e) Make it playable once per game.
f) Make it playable for Sabbat titles too (AB,CAR maybe PRIS).
g) Ban the card, it is bad for the game.
h) Make it playable by Primogens only or Justicars only.
a) Card is fine as it is.
b) Change X pool to X-1 pool (X=number of Meths).
c) Set X to 3 (or less).
d) Make it playable once per Meth.
e) Make it playable once per game.
f) Make it playable for Sabbat titles too (AB,CAR maybe PRIS).
g) Ban the card, it is bad for the game.
h) Make it playable by Primogens only or Justicars only.
Baron of Frankfurt
Last edit: 27 Nov 2011 08:33 by Joscha.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
26 Nov 2011 19:31 #16075
by Wedge
Replied by Wedge on topic Re: On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".
You didn't like, change the requirement to primogen only?
Laugh out loud
How about no action modifiers can be played during the referendum of this vote.
Laugh out loud
How about no action modifiers can be played during the referendum of this vote.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
26 Nov 2011 19:57 #16083
by echiang
pckvtes.wordpress.com
@pckvtes
Replied by echiang on topic Re: On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".
Alternatively, you could go the other direction and keep to to Justicars only.You didn't like, change the requirement to primogen only?
pckvtes.wordpress.com
@pckvtes
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
27 Nov 2011 00:46 #16131
by Ohlmann
Replied by Ohlmann on topic Re: On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".
This one seem a lot better. A shame that Villon could not play it anymore, but "important" princes and "weak" prince is not a concept that exist in VtES.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
27 Nov 2011 00:54 #16132
by direwolf
Independent Futurist. Contrarian (titled, X votes where X is the number of votes as the acting minion.) Target Vitals is always the better combat card.
Replied by direwolf on topic Re: On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".
What about X - the number of Parity Shifts in all players ash heap. (where X is # Methuselahs)




Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.096 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Foro
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Card Balance & Strategy Discussion
- On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".