Announcement of 10 consecutive tournaments in Belgrade
15 Feb 2026 14:59 #116430
by angrynewb
Replied by angrynewb on topic Announcement of 10 consecutive tournaments in Belgrade
uhm ok, maybe you misunderstand how the ranking works? you only get best 8 tournaments ranked in the current 18 month period.
10 player tournament win with 3GW 12VP will give you about 130 RtP.
130x8= 1040 rating. not even top 10
quick math if you add those wins to Milos ranking he would be at 1150 rating. also not top 10.
you really need to win tournaments with high participation (40+ players) to advance top10 ranks.
10 player tournament win with 3GW 12VP will give you about 130 RtP.
130x8= 1040 rating. not even top 10
quick math if you add those wins to Milos ranking he would be at 1150 rating. also not top 10.
you really need to win tournaments with high participation (40+ players) to advance top10 ranks.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 Feb 2026 15:58 - 15 Feb 2026 16:30 #116431
by mipopo3
As i know 194, should be the best case, so 1552, on all 8, but true, more players better.




Replied by mipopo3 on topic Announcement of 10 consecutive tournaments in Belgrade
uhm ok, maybe you misunderstand how the ranking works? you only get best 8 tournaments ranked in the current 18 month period.
10 player tournament win with 3GW 12VP will give you about 130 RtP.
130x8= 1040 rating. not even top 10
quick math if you add those wins to Milos ranking he would be at 1150 rating. also not top 10.
you really need to win tournaments with high participation (40+ players) to advance top10 ranks.
As i know 194, should be the best case, so 1552, on all 8, but true, more players better.
Last edit: 15 Feb 2026 16:30 by mipopo3.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 Feb 2026 16:26 #116432
by doubleDJ
Replied by doubleDJ on topic Announcement of 10 consecutive tournaments in Belgrade
I kindly propose to lock and close this topic, as both potentially toxic and speculative.
The ruling ans explanation given in the other thread that was started clearly expalined that ban of a particular player does not mean that that automatically disqualifies a venue from hosting the tournament.
As for the local implications of this outcome of events, we are aiming to resolve this over a community meeting.
Best,
The ruling ans explanation given in the other thread that was started clearly expalined that ban of a particular player does not mean that that automatically disqualifies a venue from hosting the tournament.
As for the local implications of this outcome of events, we are aiming to resolve this over a community meeting.
Best,
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 Feb 2026 18:36 - 15 Feb 2026 18:39 #116434
by angrynewb
Replied by angrynewb on topic Announcement of 10 consecutive tournaments in Belgrade
hm i dont know where your calculation went wrong.
i can calculate you the absolute maximum amount.
4gw+20vp= 112 rating
+5 participation rating= 117 rating
Coef = log15(NumPlayers2) - 1 = log15(100)-1= 0,7
rtp for winning= 90x0,7=63= 180 rtp tops (which, to my knowledge, no living being ever achieved xD)
i can calculate you the absolute maximum amount.
4gw+20vp= 112 rating
+5 participation rating= 117 rating
Coef = log15(NumPlayers2) - 1 = log15(100)-1= 0,7
rtp for winning= 90x0,7=63= 180 rtp tops (which, to my knowledge, no living being ever achieved xD)
Last edit: 15 Feb 2026 18:39 by angrynewb.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 Feb 2026 22:50 - 15 Feb 2026 22:52 #116438
by Ankha
A few remarks:
1/ if you want to "prove" something that is mathematically provable, you don't have to do it in real life.
2/ organizing tournaments in order to "demonstrate how this will disrupt the player standing in standard" is a way of trying to cheat somehow, no matter how you turn the thing. "Disrupting player standing" cannot be considered as ethical especially when =>
3/ all tournaments are supposed to be as inclusive as possible. Sometimes organizers don't have the choice in the venue that may prevent some people from coming, but choosing such locations on purpose of excluding eligible players hinders the section 1. of the www.vekn.net/tournament-rulesTournament rules , that is player eligibility:
1.1. Player Eligibility
Any player is eligible to participate in an open, non-invitational, V:EKN-sanctioned tournament (for non-open tournaments, see section 9.8) except for the following:
The tournament organizer of record (unless he or she is participating in an event that uses the Multi-Judge System; see section 2.9);
The head judge and any other listed judges of record (exception: see section 2.9);
Players currently suspended by the V:EKN;
Other players specifically prohibited from participation by V:EKN or Black Chantry Productions limited policy.
Any ineligible player participating in a V:EKN-sanctioned tournament will be subject to the Judges' Guide and further V:EKN review.
Replied by Ankha on topic Announcement of 10 consecutive tournaments in Belgrade
Hello all,
Fallowing the ruling on www.vekn.net/forum/rules-questions/82824-non-vtes-ban-ruling-question.
We will be starting series of scheduled events with restricted access solely based on location Banishment.
Thus only selected 10 player will be participating.
This was made to demonstrate how this will disrupt the player standing in standard, and change the top 5 player ranking.
Fallowing this ruling we are under no sanctions for this and it does not brake set Code of Ethics and stated rules.
A few remarks:
1/ if you want to "prove" something that is mathematically provable, you don't have to do it in real life.
2/ organizing tournaments in order to "demonstrate how this will disrupt the player standing in standard" is a way of trying to cheat somehow, no matter how you turn the thing. "Disrupting player standing" cannot be considered as ethical especially when =>
3/ all tournaments are supposed to be as inclusive as possible. Sometimes organizers don't have the choice in the venue that may prevent some people from coming, but choosing such locations on purpose of excluding eligible players hinders the section 1. of the www.vekn.net/tournament-rulesTournament rules , that is player eligibility:
1.1. Player Eligibility
Any player is eligible to participate in an open, non-invitational, V:EKN-sanctioned tournament (for non-open tournaments, see section 9.8) except for the following:
The tournament organizer of record (unless he or she is participating in an event that uses the Multi-Judge System; see section 2.9);
The head judge and any other listed judges of record (exception: see section 2.9);
Players currently suspended by the V:EKN;
Other players specifically prohibited from participation by V:EKN or Black Chantry Productions limited policy.
Any ineligible player participating in a V:EKN-sanctioned tournament will be subject to the Judges' Guide and further V:EKN review.
Last edit: 15 Feb 2026 22:52 by Ankha.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.069 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Foro
-
V:TES Events
-
Event Announcements
-
Europe
- Announcement of 10 consecutive tournaments in Belgrade
