file Announcement of 10 consecutive tournaments in Belgrade

15 Feb 2026 14:59 #116430 by angrynewb
uhm ok, maybe you misunderstand how the ranking works? you only get best 8 tournaments ranked in the current 18 month period.

10 player tournament win with 3GW 12VP will give you about 130 RtP.

130x8= 1040 rating. not even top 10 :(

quick math if you add those wins to Milos ranking he would be at 1150 rating. also not top 10.

you really need to win tournaments with high participation (40+ players) to advance top10 ranks.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Feb 2026 15:58 - 15 Feb 2026 16:30 #116431 by mipopo3

uhm ok, maybe you misunderstand how the ranking works? you only get best 8 tournaments ranked in the current 18 month period.

10 player tournament win with 3GW 12VP will give you about 130 RtP.

130x8= 1040 rating. not even top 10 :(

quick math if you add those wins to Milos ranking he would be at 1150 rating. also not top 10.

you really need to win tournaments with high participation (40+ players) to advance top10 ranks.


As i know 194, should be the best case, so 1552, on all 8, but true, more players better.

:gang::ANI::FOR::PRO::cap8:
Last edit: 15 Feb 2026 16:30 by mipopo3.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Feb 2026 16:26 #116432 by doubleDJ
I kindly propose to lock and close this topic, as both potentially toxic and speculative.

The ruling ans explanation given in the other thread that was started clearly expalined that ban of a particular player does not mean that that automatically disqualifies a venue from hosting the tournament.

As for the local implications of this outcome of events, we are aiming to resolve this over a community meeting.

Best,

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Feb 2026 18:36 - 15 Feb 2026 18:39 #116434 by angrynewb
hm i dont know where your calculation went wrong.
i can calculate you the absolute maximum amount.

4gw+20vp= 112 rating
+5 participation rating= 117 rating
Coef = log15(NumPlayers2) - 1 = log15(100)-1= 0,7
rtp for winning= 90x0,7=63= 180 rtp tops (which, to my knowledge, no living being ever achieved xD)
Last edit: 15 Feb 2026 18:39 by angrynewb.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Feb 2026 22:50 - 15 Feb 2026 22:52 #116438 by Ankha

Hello all,

Fallowing the ruling on www.vekn.net/forum/rules-questions/82824-non-vtes-ban-ruling-question.

We will be starting series of scheduled events with restricted access solely based on location Banishment.

Thus only selected 10 player will be participating.

This was made to demonstrate how this will disrupt the player standing in standard, and change the top 5 player ranking.

Fallowing this ruling we are under no sanctions for this and it does not brake set Code of Ethics and stated rules.


A few remarks:
1/ if you want to "prove" something that is mathematically provable, you don't have to do it in real life.
2/ organizing tournaments in order to "demonstrate how this will disrupt the player standing in standard" is a way of trying to cheat somehow, no matter how you turn the thing. "Disrupting player standing" cannot be considered as ethical especially when =>
3/ all tournaments are supposed to be as inclusive as possible. Sometimes organizers don't have the choice in the venue that may prevent some people from coming, but choosing such locations on purpose of excluding eligible players hinders the section 1. of the www.vekn.net/tournament-rulesTournament rules , that is player eligibility:

1.1. Player Eligibility
Any player is eligible to participate in an open, non-invitational, V:EKN-sanctioned tournament (for non-open tournaments, see section 9.8) except for the following:

The tournament organizer of record (unless he or she is participating in an event that uses the Multi-Judge System; see section 2.9);
The head judge and any other listed judges of record (exception: see section 2.9);
Players currently suspended by the V:EKN;
Other players specifically prohibited from participation by V:EKN or Black Chantry Productions limited policy.
Any ineligible player participating in a V:EKN-sanctioned tournament will be subject to the Judges' Guide and further V:EKN review.

Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
Last edit: 15 Feb 2026 22:52 by Ankha.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Moderators: AnkhaKraus
Time to create page: 0.069 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum