Annazir's built in action

Reyda wrote:

Oh Hai.
If I untap Annazir after having stolen an equipment, can I go and burn a location or is it considered "having already used this card's buit in action" ?

It does count as using one of Annazir's built-in actions, but you can still use the other one.

Reyda wrote:

And as a sidenote, If i "steal an equipment" and this equipement is an untapped helicopter, do I tap it or does it stay untapped for more funky actions ?

thanks !

Reminder text :
Independent: Annazir has 2 votes (titled). He may burn a location or steal an equipment as a action. +1 bleed. Infernal.

An action to steal an equipment isn't an action to equip. If Annazir steals a Helicopter via his ability, the Helicopter doesn't tap. Similarly, an action to diablerize someone with an equipment isn't an action to equip, even though you may have some new equipment in the end.

Great !
now, what about Sebastian goulet merged ?

"He can steal a retainer or an ally as a +1 stealth action."

Can I steal an ally, then a retainer in the same turn ?

And for Bulscu ?
" If you control the Edge, Bulscu can steal a location or an equipment in play that costs 3 or less pool or blood as a action."

So all built in actions with multiple choices of target are indeed separate actions ?

Reyda wrote:

Great !
now, what about Sebastian goulet merged ?

"He can steal a retainer or an ally as a +1 stealth action."

Can I steal an ally, then a retainer in the same turn ?

No.

Reyda wrote:

And for Bulscu ?
" If you control the Edge, Bulscu can steal a location or an equipment in play that costs 3 or less pool or blood as a action."

So all built in actions with multiple choices of target are indeed separate actions ?

No.
And same for Ebanezer Roush. It's the same action, only the target changes in these cases.

So, for Bulscu and Sebastian Goulet, the action is actually "steal", not "steal a retainer", "steal an ally", "steal a location" or "steal an equipment". But for Annazir, the actions are "steal" or "burn", so he has 2 actions.

I like that clarification.

Just to make sure: If Sebastian Goulet adv. was written "Sebastian Goulet may steal a retainer or steal an ally as a action", would that change the answer?