On Villein. 1. "problematic card"

I should be possible to choose more then one option. B)

Amenophobis wrote:

I should be possible to choose more then one option. B)

I thought about that too. But the guys who wants no change would then have just one vote, others more. I dont't think this would lead to a significant result. What two options do you think I have to sum up and merge into one point?

Joscha wrote:

Amenophobis wrote:

I should be possible to choose more then one option. B)

I thought about that too. But the guys who wants no change would then have just one vote, others more. I dont't think this would lead to a significant result. What two options do you think I have to sum up and merge into one point?

IMO points c) and d).
I strongly believe that the hosing should be reduced somewhat, and it should only give 6 pool max.

Amenophobis wrote:

IMO points c) and d).
I strongly believe that the hosing should be reduced somewhat, and it should only give 6 pool max.

c) should be seen in relation with f) ... If changing the card text, I highly recommend not (only) to say "up to 5", but (in addition) to say "at least 2 blood must remain on the vampire" ... Else midcamp vampire would benefit most from the change, and you exchanged only the problematic capacity ...

A), although it implies that it's ok to change other cards and I don't believe in that either.
So... G) Change nothing. The game is balanced with the current set of legal card texts.

Brum wrote:

A), although it implies that it's ok to change other cards and I don't believe in that either.
So... G) Change nothing. The game is balanced with the current set of legal card texts.

Having witnessed a lot of timeout at the EC, mostly due to Villeins, I strongly contest that.