Card idea: Namtaru

Their lore is deliberately hazy at best, so generally Shaitan is a tricky issue. There's Shaitan childe of Ashur, who became Huitzilopochtli and awakened in 1996 (Chaos Factor) and then there's also Shaitan who is Nergal, he who wishes to rouse Namtaru to awaken (VtDA-CB:Baali). So this would mean there is more than one Shaitan right? But Gehenna claims Nergal/Shaitan is the only Shaitan, so this problematic. What's the deal?

Revised also points to that the Baali came from a lowly Mesopotamian slave boy who was Embraced, pointing towards the Shaitan/Huitzilopochtli rather than the origin of the three progenitors (Nergal, Moloch and the Unnamed). Should one simply assume the Baali origin is truly unknown or rather they have multiple progenitors or that simply many claim the mantle of Shaitan? Although the Setites claim Saulot is the 'Father of Demons' in revised.

Also what do people think the Children are? Demon the Fallen makes an offhanded reference to a Fallen named bel-Namtaru, whose dominion is around Greece. This would make the Children Fallen if Namtaru is one of them. Then again, the non-scenario specific information in Gehenna implies that Namtaru could in fact be an Antediluvian rather than a demon. It also implies that Nergal of the Aralu may be different to Nergal/Shaitan and another Antediluvian.

Wiki wrote:

Azaneali
One significant historical bloodline of the Baali are called Azaneali; the result of a pact between a Baali named Azaneal and infernalist Lasombra (angellis ater). Azaneal sought to find the lost city of Mashkan-shapir said to be built over an ancient demonic entity named Namtaru. The Azaneali may replace either Daimoinon or Presence with the Obtenebration discipline. Only twelve such Baali were sired, and they carried the additional weakness of being sterile. It is uncertain if any survived into the modern era.[5]