lot of cards idea

its true, but when i created, i dont look at asanbonsam for example

there are many cards that need revision.
my intention, its offer my ideas about new cards and between all players improve them

thanks for your opinion.

jozxyqk wrote:

Just a note: the word "Patagia" literally means "Flaps allowing limited flight".
So you might want to pick a different keyword to describe your alternate physical deformities.

i was looking for a generic name to the deformities, but i dont find any that like me, because that i took advantage from the only deformity card from the game an use that for a generic type card, like weapon, animal retainer, werewolf...

Germi wrote:

jozxyqk wrote:

Just a note: the word "Patagia" literally means "Flaps allowing limited flight".
So you might want to pick a different keyword to describe your alternate physical deformities.

i was looking for a generic name to the deformities, but i dont find any that like me, because that i took advantage from the only deformity card from the game an use that for a generic type card, like weapon, animal retainer, werewolf...

I totally feel you dude I often find myself using words that I pick up from context (sometimes incorrectly!) I also like to think that the idea of the card is the point, details like the name of the card, or a misspelling, or the wording of the card is second to the IDEA.

However, people on forums like to nitpick. About words, and grammar and the order the words are in. It's annoying. I like to post ideas. Even bad ones (See Autarkis. That got way more play than I thought!)

I will recommend you look up words you don't fully understand, or look up synonyms. I do that ALL the time when I am posting. Even if it's only to confirm the meaning of a word. It will help you get the idea across better. Even if it's a bad idea, at least the feedback will be limited to correcting that

At this very moment I have a tab open to merriam-webster.com