Anti-multi-action
15 Apr 2012 18:17 #27947
by Izaak
No, the only thing that will take a step down is fatties playing 20+ Freak Drives. Which isn't neccesarily a bad thing. In fact I'd argue it'd be a good thing.
Normal Freak Drive use remains unchanged.
Replied by Izaak on topic Re: Anti-multi-action
No, bigger vampires without fortitude remain as limited as they are now and get no better while the others take a step down.
No, the only thing that will take a step down is fatties playing 20+ Freak Drives. Which isn't neccesarily a bad thing. In fact I'd argue it'd be a good thing.
Normal Freak Drive use remains unchanged.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 Apr 2012 21:27 - 15 Apr 2012 21:29 #27963
by Miasmat
Replied by Miasmat on topic Re: Anti-multi-action
If punishing multi-acting is your goal, maybe Vampiric Disease is really what you should play more.
Master.
Put a disease counter on any vampire. Each time a vampire with a disease counter is in combat at close range with another vampire, the second vampire gets a counter as well. An afflicted vampire cannot gain blood by hunting. When an afflicted vampire untaps, he or she burns a blood or, if unable, burns the disease counter. A vampire can have only one disease counter.
Last edit: 15 Apr 2012 21:29 by Miasmat.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 Apr 2012 02:06 #27966
by blackday
Replied by blackday on topic Re: Anti-multi-action
totakly agree with miasmat, vampiric disease will shut down an Una multi action deck anytime.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.081 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Expansion Sets & Card Ideas
- Anti-multi-action