Grouping rule- wrap around grouping?

I believe this has been mentioned before, but maybe not on this forum or at length. What do you folks think about allowing group 6 and group 1 to work together? I don't see anything particularly broken there, especially since group 6 has only 33 vampires, but it might be fun.

I can't think of anything too game-breaking there. It'd be kinda fun to have Shalmath and Masika in the same deck.

but I don't think it would add much to either group. Most of the bloodlines like to mixed in with independents (mostly Giovanni for NEC) or Sabbat (like Lasombra & Kiasyd, or !Salubri & !Ventrue). They already got the G5 independents, but not a good G5 Sabbat selection unfortunately. mixing them with G1 Camarilla is redundant since there's already a nice G5 Camarilla to choose from.

G1 already has so many great crypt combos with G2. It's still quite popular, despite the wallpaper cards like Dr Jest. and if someone wanted to mix with Bloodlines, they can already use G2! instead of handicapping themselves by going backwards to G6 where there's no IC and no Sabbat weenies.

I very much like the idea!!!

I don't have a problem with it, but honestly I think it would be about as useful as a waterproof teabag. So if you want, go for gold.

As several pointed out above, there might not be a lot of use in doing it. And without a clear use, I would say no, as all rule changes are cumbersome.