Optimal seatings changes
vekn.net/forum/9-event-reports-and-twd/69254
Used the latest Archon (1,5c) for the first time and I don't reacll if I ever encountered that before with the previous versions.
Not really optimal if you play all three games in the same table as one other player... :/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Archon 1.5c contains the historical seating. The new seatings for 2R+F will be in the next archon.Last tournament we had (10 plrs with 3R+F) two players were on the same table the whole game. Apparently Marko's deck shut down Tom's pretty well in all of those so he wasn't exactly happy about it.
vekn.net/forum/9-event-reports-and-twd/69254
Used the latest Archon (1,5c) for the first time and I don't reacll if I ever encountered that before with the previous versions.
Not really optimal if you play all three games in the same table as one other player... :/
I haven't started to work on 3R+F yet, but with 10 players, there is a high possiblity that you are obliged to have 2 players share the same table the whole 3 rounds.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
If you only have two tables, each player has to play on one of them at least twice.
The only way to avoid this is more players then 10 so you get more then 2 tables.
David Tatu
V:EKN Scribe
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- david.tatu
- Offline
- Methuselah
- Posts: 203
- Thank you received: 75
R1: [1 2 3 4 5] and [6 7 8 9 10]
Consider player 1. On round 2, let's say he must be sitting with noone of the first table, so :
R2: [1 6 7 8 9] and the rest: [2 3 4 5 10]
Now consider player 6: he must sit with players others than 7, 8 and 9 so:
R3: [6 10 3 4 5] which gives as the last table [1 2 7 8 9]
So 7, 8 and 9 have shared 3 games.
Or let's say he sits with a player from the first round (eg. 2):
R2: [1 2 6 7 8] and [3 4 5 9 10]
Considering again player 6:
R3: [6 9 10 1 3] and [2 4 5 7 8]
So 7 and 8 have shared 3 games
Or let's say he sits with two players from the first round (eg. 2 and 3):
R2: [1 2 3 6 7 ] and [4 5 8 9 10]
Considering again player 6:
R3: [6 8 9 10 1] and [2 3 4 5 7] (8 and 9, 2 and 3 have shared 3 games)
or [6 8 9 10 2] and [1 3 4 5 7] (8 and 9, 3 and 4 have shared 3 games)
or [6 8 9 10 3] and [1 2 4 5 7] (8 and 9, 4 and 5 have shared 3 games)
or [6 8 9 10 4] and [1 2 3 5 7]
etc.
Or let's say he sits with three players from the first round (eg. 2, 3 and 4):
R2: [1 2 3 4 6 ] and [5 7 8 9 10]
Considering again player 6:
R3: [6 7 8 9 10] and [1 2 3 4 5] (7, 8, 9 and 10 shared 3 games)
etc.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Because right now the three games goes like this:
game 1: A is prey of B
game 2: B is prey of A
game 3: A is grand prey of B
I think it would be better as:
game 1: A is prey of B
game 2: B is grand prey of A
game 3: A is grand prey of B
...if possible.
Marko, Prince of Helsinki
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- You are here:
- Home
- Forum
- V:TES Discussion
- Generic V:TES Discussion
- Optimal seatings changes