Vampire reboot more likely than new sets?
16 Nov 2015 19:38 #74332
by Juggernaut1981
Baron of Sydney, Australia, 418
Replied by Juggernaut1981 on topic Re: Vampire reboot more likely than new sets?
Crazier thought...
If we get a 'rebuild' rather than a 'reboot'...
Do we need to have the cards remain the same size? Could we for instance have 'crypt cards' (or their equivalent) 2.5"x3.5". Could they become 3.5"x3.5" or a similar larger format that would allow for more 'art' or incorporating icons of various sorts.
If we get a 'rebuild' rather than a 'reboot'...
Do we need to have the cards remain the same size? Could we for instance have 'crypt cards' (or their equivalent) 2.5"x3.5". Could they become 3.5"x3.5" or a similar larger format that would allow for more 'art' or incorporating icons of various sorts.
Baron of Sydney, Australia, 418
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Juggernaut1981
- Offline
- Antediluvian
Less
More
- Posts: 2376
- Thank you received: 326
16 Nov 2015 20:54 #74334
by BenPeal
From a player's perspective, I'd guess there'd be a preference for keeping the card sizes the same for the convenience of not having to buy differently-sized card sleeves.
From a publisher's perspective, it means being able to put crypt cards and library cards in the same print run, resulting in lower printing costs.
Replied by BenPeal on topic Re: Vampire reboot more likely than new sets?
Crazier thought...
If we get a 'rebuild' rather than a 'reboot'...
Do we need to have the cards remain the same size? Could we for instance have 'crypt cards' (or their equivalent) 2.5"x3.5". Could they become 3.5"x3.5" or a similar larger format that would allow for more 'art' or incorporating icons of various sorts.
From a player's perspective, I'd guess there'd be a preference for keeping the card sizes the same for the convenience of not having to buy differently-sized card sleeves.
From a publisher's perspective, it means being able to put crypt cards and library cards in the same print run, resulting in lower printing costs.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 Nov 2015 20:05 #74495
by Thin_Blood
“I don’t have cross table buddies. I have a prey I haven’t gotten around to yet.” — Shockwave (English VtES Player).
Replied by Thin_Blood on topic Re: Vampire reboot more likely than new sets?
This is some good work here! I like what I see and look forward to a finished product. Here is hoping that we can revitalize the game and bring in some new blood.
“I don’t have cross table buddies. I have a prey I haven’t gotten around to yet.” — Shockwave (English VtES Player).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Thin_Blood
- Offline
- Neonate
Less
More
- Posts: 21
- Thank you received: 4
22 Nov 2015 02:08 #74499
by Juggernaut1981
Baron of Sydney, Australia, 418
Replied by Juggernaut1981 on topic Re: Vampire reboot more likely than new sets?
Thanks, at the moment I'm not doing heaps of extra work on things like cards, purely because doing so while engaging for me mentally... may just a big pile of sweet FA especially if Paradox just plough on with VTES. So, the sentiments are appreciated, but it's mostly in a 'tinkering' stage at the moment.This is some good work here! I like what I see and look forward to a finished product. Here is hoping that we can revitalize the game and bring in some new blood.
Baron of Sydney, Australia, 418
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Juggernaut1981
- Offline
- Antediluvian
Less
More
- Posts: 2376
- Thank you received: 326
Time to create page: 0.099 seconds
- You are here:
- Home
- Forum
- V:TES Discussion
- Generic V:TES Discussion
- Vampire reboot more likely than new sets?