Finals are boring. Pt. 3: Rules for the finals

Vlad wrote:

acbishop wrote:

Non-existant user wrote:

Which leaves only the other option available: if the table times out without a GW, everyone at the table must lose. Give the TW to the sixth, to another random player, to the organiser or to nobody, but none of the finalists should get it.

Finalist are the best five players of the tournament during the previous round, for me not having one of them as the tournament winner is not logical.

Not always Antonio, sometimes people know how to play in order not to give any GW on their table... for example a 2/2/1...which gives them or someone they know a better chance for a Final...

What i Propose would be a 3 or 4 rounds tournament, but the last round will be a Final using the Swiss Round method...

The first 5 play a Final, and then the second 5, etc...

The winner of the tournament will be the winner of the first table, if there is no such winner, you go to the second one, etc...

What would you all think of that ?

Non-existant user wrote:

Then you can still use the seeding after that (and anyway, it is still needed for qualifier events), but that's fine: since players have no control on the other tables, even the first seed will have no interest in letting his own table time out.