Direct action question
21 Jun 2018 11:49 #88329
by nergalmcl
Replied by nergalmcl on topic Direct action question
Thank you guys.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 Jun 2018 11:54 #88330
by TwoRazorReign
Yes. Rescuing your own vampire from torpor, leaving torpor, hunting, political actions, equip actions, recruiting allies, and employing retainers are fundamental undirected actions in the game that also get the exception of having +1 stealth. The problem is, in real life, the +1 stealth is really not an exception. It's the rule for the most common undirected actions a player can perform.
The rulebook needs a dedicated section explaining directed and undirected actions. It should not be buried in the "who may attempt to block" explanation. This would not only help clarify that undirected actions usually have a default of 0 stealth, but it will also help explain the stupid
symbol, which has caused just a ridiculous amount of confusion ("I am going to enter combat with your minion as a
action, so you have to tap your minion because it is an action directed at you...isn't that why the
symbol is there?")
Replied by TwoRazorReign on topic Direct action question
It is a common mistake to assume that directed actions against your own minions gain +1 stealth simply by turning into undirected actions. This is usually because players assume that the rescue-a-vampire-from-torpor action (0-stealth directed action against another Methuselah or a +1 stealth undirected action against yourself) is analogous to the behavior for all directed-to-undirected actions.
Yes. Rescuing your own vampire from torpor, leaving torpor, hunting, political actions, equip actions, recruiting allies, and employing retainers are fundamental undirected actions in the game that also get the exception of having +1 stealth. The problem is, in real life, the +1 stealth is really not an exception. It's the rule for the most common undirected actions a player can perform.
The rulebook needs a dedicated section explaining directed and undirected actions. It should not be buried in the "who may attempt to block" explanation. This would not only help clarify that undirected actions usually have a default of 0 stealth, but it will also help explain the stupid



Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TwoRazorReign
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 739
- Thank you received: 170
21 Jun 2018 13:55 #88332
by self biased
My playgroup used to play with the notion that actions that said "
Bleed" could target anybody, because it was a
action.
Replied by self biased on topic Direct action question
The rulebook needs a dedicated section explaining directed and undirected actions. It should not be buried in the "who may attempt to block" explanation. This would not only help clarify that undirected actions usually have a default of 0 stealth, but it will also help explain the stupid
symbol, which has caused just a ridiculous amount of confusion ("I am going to enter combat with your minion as a
action, so you have to tap your minion because it is an action directed at you...isn't that why the
symbol is there?")
My playgroup used to play with the notion that actions that said "


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- self biased
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
- I pray at an altar of farts.
Less
More
- Posts: 824
- Thank you received: 358
21 Jun 2018 21:17 #88339
by jamesatzephyr
- Leave torpor (which isn't rescue, relevant to Catacombs and Humanitas)
- Cardless Red List rush of a marked vampire
Replied by jamesatzephyr on topic Direct action question
The only cardless actions that have inherent stealth (+1) are:
-hunt
-rescuing your own vampire from torpor
- Leave torpor (which isn't rescue, relevant to Catacombs and Humanitas)
- Cardless Red List rush of a marked vampire
The following user(s) said Thank You: Lönkka
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jamesatzephyr
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2788
- Thank you received: 958
21 Jun 2018 22:09 - 21 Jun 2018 23:03 #88341
by ICL
Replied by ICL on topic Direct action question
Cardless action to become anarch.
** Edit **
And, taking equipment from your vampires (in torpor or not). Given enough effort, maybe we will come up with something else.
** Edit **
And, taking equipment from your vampires (in torpor or not). Given enough effort, maybe we will come up with something else.
Last edit: 21 Jun 2018 23:03 by ICL. Reason: More stuff
The following user(s) said Thank You: Lönkka
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 Jun 2018 22:11 #88342
by narpassword
Replied by narpassword on topic Direct action question
and eating your own vampire.
might be easier to list any cardless actions targetting yourself that arent at stealth...if there are any.
might be easier to list any cardless actions targetting yourself that arent at stealth...if there are any.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- narpassword
-
- Offline
- Elder
-
Less
More
- Posts: 132
- Thank you received: 23
Time to create page: 0.112 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Rules Questions
- Direct action question