Is inferior Pulse of the Canaille a directed action

the1andonlime wrote:

Is inferior Pulse of the Canaille a directed action?
My instincts say "no" but can find no solid evidence to back that up

It does not follow the templating of Vaticination that has been since ruled (and also via the symbol) to be a directed action
Rather, it feels like the action simply grants the controller of the acting minion and ability for the rest of the turn (what that ability does is irrelevant to the directed-ness of the action itself)

I am, however, unable to find another card with a very similar sort of templating

Pulse of the Canaille

Cardtype: Action
Cost: 3 blood
Discipline: Auspex
+1 stealth action.
[aus] For the remainder of this turn, you may look at all Methuselahs' hands.
[AUS] Put this card on the acting vampire. The vampire with this card gets +2 bleed. A vampire can have only one Pulse of the Canaille.
Artist: Anson Maddocks; Hannibal King

inm8 wrote:

Ankha wrote:

Since the card, upon resolution, does nothing other than set an effect for the rest of the turn, it is not directed to whatever targets it affects for the rest of the turn.

How do you explain below post from LSJ, where the change was about correcting the grammar of the targeting (changed to the plural form)???

And if there are targets, it cannot be undirected?!?!

Pulse of the Canaille - Action (aus) (3)
* The inferior is grammatically incorrect, mixing singular and plural for
the target. The correct reading is, as in the Jyhad version, "... may
look at all Methuselahs' hands." [LSJ 19980211]

usenet.krcg.org/t/hMnXiu-tgw0/#m9