DoC Beneficial Anarchy
16 Apr 2012 20:07 #28021
by Haze
Replied by Haze on topic Re: DoC Beneficial Anarchy
most Death Star decks succeed by playing conservatively and staying alive until they've got the anarch fleet set up. then they use Garibaldi Meucci Museum + Revolutionary Council every turn and it's all over. the main problem now is that many people recognize the deck type and might feel threatened by it before it's set up.
I once used many copies of Exclusion Principle because I didn't care if anyone else gained pool from my vote, as long as I gained the most. any pool I give them will eventually be wiped out twice as fast by Revolutionary Council.
Lily Prelude might still be worth it in this deck, because it is so much stronger than KRC even at basic
and it's much more cost efficient than Reckless Agitation.
I once used many copies of Exclusion Principle because I didn't care if anyone else gained pool from my vote, as long as I gained the most. any pool I give them will eventually be wiped out twice as fast by Revolutionary Council.
Lily Prelude might still be worth it in this deck, because it is so much stronger than KRC even at basic

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 Apr 2012 05:48 #28051
by Kiddo
Replied by Kiddo on topic Re: DoC Beneficial Anarchy
Yup, I edited decklist (last post on the previous page) and it includes 4 Lilys - they truly are too good to pass.
Thanks for all the comments and suggestions, guys. I'll probably play a couple of games tomorrow, so I'll report how the deck preformed.
Thanks for all the comments and suggestions, guys. I'll probably play a couple of games tomorrow, so I'll report how the deck preformed.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 Apr 2012 09:01 #28061
by Cooper
Replied by Cooper on topic Re: DoC Beneficial Anarchy
how about just 2 of that massive bleedmodifier?
If your prey plays dom or AUS, just discard it asap. It will effectively lower their handsize to 5, as they wil keep 2 bounces in their hand at all times.
If your prey does not play dom or AUS, use it unblockable at the right moment.
W
If your prey plays dom or AUS, just discard it asap. It will effectively lower their handsize to 5, as they wil keep 2 bounces in their hand at all times.
If your prey does not play dom or AUS, use it unblockable at the right moment.
W
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 Apr 2012 09:45 #28062
by Kiddo
You mean Ensemble?
Yeah, with that number of vamps, it could be a nasty surprise indeed, especially if I bleed for max 1 the entire game...
Replied by Kiddo on topic Re: DoC Beneficial Anarchy
how about just 2 of that massive bleedmodifier?
You mean Ensemble?
Ensemble
Type: Action Modifier
Requires: Daughter of Cacophony
Cost: 1 blood
After playing this card, you cannot play another action modifier to further increase the bleed for this action.
+X bleed, where X is the number of ready untapped Daughters of Cacophony you control. Tap all ready Daughters of Cacophony you control.
Rarity: Promo:20061026
Yeah, with that number of vamps, it could be a nasty surprise indeed, especially if I bleed for max 1 the entire game...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 Apr 2012 08:49 - 21 Apr 2012 08:49 #28289
by Kiddo
Replied by Kiddo on topic Re: DoC Beneficial Anarchy
Played one game, earned 1 VP and then died due to spending my entire library (and thus not being able to retrieve enough Revolutions via Museum to oust my new prey, who bloated himself to ridiculous amounts). My final act was pretty spectacular though, with a single Council destroying 9 equipments and locations on the table - hilarious).
However, and this might be just because of the local meta, I for the longest time had serious problems obtaining vote lock: my prey was playing G4-5 non-political Ventrue (had out Justicar+3 Princes and damned Ventrue HQ), while my pred had G2 Tzimisce with Cardinal and Priscus. As it turned out, I needed max # of barons out (which, sadly is 3 for DoC) and both a Conductor and Bastille OH (with 9 vamps out) to surpass their 18 votes...
So, my question is: should I replace House of Sorrow (which was nice, but far from essential) with another Bastille OH or was this amount of votes in a 4-player game more of a fluke?
However, and this might be just because of the local meta, I for the longest time had serious problems obtaining vote lock: my prey was playing G4-5 non-political Ventrue (had out Justicar+3 Princes and damned Ventrue HQ), while my pred had G2 Tzimisce with Cardinal and Priscus. As it turned out, I needed max # of barons out (which, sadly is 3 for DoC) and both a Conductor and Bastille OH (with 9 vamps out) to surpass their 18 votes...
So, my question is: should I replace House of Sorrow (which was nice, but far from essential) with another Bastille OH or was this amount of votes in a 4-player game more of a fluke?
Last edit: 21 Apr 2012 08:49 by Kiddo.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 Apr 2012 10:05 #28292
by Poci
Replied by Poci on topic Re: DoC Beneficial Anarchy
Definitely a fluke. Play a few crytic rider.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.092 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Foro
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Deck Clinic
- DoC Beneficial Anarchy