Timeouts in tournaments

15 Mar 2012 08:54 #25889 by jhattara

Replied by jhattara on topic Re: Timeouts in tournaments

t.p wrote:
What about changing .5 VP for surviving to time limit, to -.25 VP penalty? I’ve noticed that „Grab 2 VP, stall the game, get GW“ was quite often the strategy on last EC. This way one will have to act more instead of wait in order to win the game.

I would strongly disapprove such decision, because penalizing people for not losing is never good. With that losing the game (e.g. self-ousting) would actually be playing to win (0 VP is more than -0.25 VP).

Jussi Hattara :splat:

Webmaster Extraordinaire :vtes:

Finnish

Politics!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

jhattara
Offline
Inconnu

15 Mar 2012 10:31 - 15 Mar 2012 10:32 #25894 by DTA

Replied by DTA on topic Re: Timeouts in tournaments

Would not only giving players that already got 1 or more VPs eligible for the 0.5vp solve many timeout situations? since then you would gain noting from just surviving to the end.

Last edit: 15 Mar 2012 10:32 by DTA.

The following user(s) said Thank You: Stefan

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

DTA
Offline
Childe

15 Mar 2012 10:37 #25895 by jhattara

Replied by jhattara on topic Re: Timeouts in tournaments

DTA wrote:
Would not only giving players that already got 1 or more VPs eligible for the 0.5vp solve many timeout situations? since then you would gain noting from just surviving to the end.

Same issue. 2vp is more than 1.75vp.

Jussi Hattara :splat:

Webmaster Extraordinaire :vtes:

Finnish

Politics!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

jhattara
Offline
Inconnu

15 Mar 2012 10:51 #25896 by TunFiskeMad

Replied by TunFiskeMad on topic Re: Timeouts in tournaments

jhattara wrote:

DTA wrote:
Would not only giving players that already got 1 or more VPs eligible for the 0.5vp solve many timeout situations? since then you would gain noting from just surviving to the end.

Same issue. 2vp is more than 1.75vp.

I think he ment: Only people with atleast 1 vp will get the 0,5 vp in case of at timeout.

- I have bitten the mighy judge-beard.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

TunFiskeMad
Offline
Neonate

15 Mar 2012 11:08 #25898 by jhattara

Replied by jhattara on topic Re: Timeouts in tournaments

TunFiskeMad wrote:

jhattara wrote:

DTA wrote:
Would not only giving players that already got 1 or more VPs eligible for the 0.5vp solve many timeout situations? since then you would gain noting from just surviving to the end.

Same issue. 2vp is more than 1.75vp.
I think he ment: Only people with atleast 1 vp will get the 0,5 vp in case of at timeout.

Wouldn't do anything to the perceived issue of people first getting 2 vp quickly and then stopping to wait for the 0.5 more and GW.

Jussi Hattara :splat:

Webmaster Extraordinaire :vtes:

Finnish

Politics!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

jhattara
Offline
Inconnu

15 Mar 2012 11:11 #25899 by Amenophobis

Replied by Amenophobis on topic Re: Timeouts in tournaments

jhattara wrote:

TunFiskeMad wrote:

jhattara wrote:

DTA wrote:
Would not only giving players that already got 1 or more VPs eligible for the 0.5vp solve many timeout situations? since then you would gain noting from just surviving to the end.

Same issue. 2vp is more than 1.75vp.
I think he ment: Only people with atleast 1 vp will get the 0,5 vp in case of at timeout.

Wouldn't do anything to the perceived issue of people first getting 2 vp quickly and then stopping to wait for the 0.5 more and GW.

If surviving players wouldn't get .5 VPs at the end, the player with 2 victorpoints would still have the GW, assuming he had more VPs than eny other players.