file On Ashur Tablets 2. "problematic card"

16 Nov 2011 14:57 #14554 by Joscha
This is the second thread of the discussions about cards some people see as problematic.

As this is a collection of arguments for keeping the card as it is (PRO card) or changing it in whatever way (CONTRA card).

It would be most useful, if you could write above your entry, if your arguments are PRO or CONTRA the card as it is to attain best clarity of what speaks in favor of the card and what does not.

After 7 days of discussion I will initialize a poll about that specific card, in which the alternatives can be found.


Ashur Tablets
Cardtype: Master
Master.
Put this card in play. If you have three copies in play, remove all copies in play (even controlled by other Methuselahs) from the game to gain 3 pool and choose up to thirteen cards from your ash heap. Move one of those cards to your hand and shuffle the others into your library.


I'm not sure on this card. I'm a bit annoyed that so many people rely on it and I think it is just so good because of Liquidation. After all it is just 3 pool for 3 MPAs. Of course recursion is always strong. But master cards are often very good. And there must be something in addtion to the poolgain. So yet I'm rather PRO.

Baron of Frankfurt

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Nov 2011 15:24 #14565 by Aeschere
PRO

Fine as it is. You sacrifice 3 MPA to get 3 pool and some cards back. True, the stalling effect it has on the game can be annoying but I can live with that.
Also the added effect of removing all Ashur Tablets on the table when it triggers makes it quite balanced.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Nov 2011 15:32 #14568 by acbishop
PRO

same reasons as Aeschere

:vtes:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Nov 2011 15:34 #14570 by Amenophobis
CONTRA

Taking repeatedly the same Sudden or DI into hand is very annoying. It synergizes too well with MMPAs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Nov 2011 15:54 #14577 by Ankha
CONTRA

The card is great, the trouble arises when played with multiple MPA vampires mainly (eg. Nana) because it allows a too strong recursion due to its "fetching" effect (see below).

The pool gain isn't a big deal. 3 MPA to gain 3 pool in the end is fine.

Shuffling back some cards isn't that strong when your library is more than half empty. Liquidation is nasty because it allows you to purge your deck.

Tutoring any card is bad, especially when you've played liquidation and your ash heap is very likely to contain that card you'd like to fetch (Anthelios, Entrancement, Giant's Blood).

I would simply remove the clause saying that you can put back a card in hand.

Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
The following user(s) said Thank You: extrala

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Nov 2011 16:12 #14581 by Pendargon
CONTRA

I feel that whole "broken" effect comes from 1 thing : multiple MPA dacks fetching back masters to abuse through multiple MPA's

So, my proposed change would be - no card goes in hand, and only gives back MINION cards.

:QUI: :POT: :OBE: :CEL: :OBF: :tore: :assa:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Moderators: AnkhaKraus
Time to create page: 0.096 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum