[Submission] Wheel of Fortune (vote reveals hands and discard master cards)

AaronC wrote:

I think its power level is very close to some of the most powerful votes in the game. Masters tend to be the most powerful cards, and people base their strategy on what masters they are going to play. If you think you're getting out Villein/Blood Doll/Pentex/Haven Uncovered/whatever next round, and then you're probably not, it's a huge swing in play. It's like sitting next to the Dementation bleed deck that packs 12 Suddens/Washes.

You have seen that the card burn once you discard, so basically you lose 1 turn maximum, and 0 turn if you redraw another copy or can use Anthelios to retrieve it ? Because what you say don't make too much sense to be honest.

If for you that's one of the most powerful vote you have seen, I would suggest to look at parity shift or Alastor.

Ohlmann wrote:

You have seen that the card burn once you discard, so basically you lose 1 turn maximum, and 0 turn if you redraw another copy or can use Anthelios to retrieve it ? Because what you say don't make too much sense to be honest.
.

To be honest, what doesn't make sense to me is the fact that you have the second-most number of posts on this forum after the VEKN rules director, but yet you remain completely anonymous.

Oh, and the fact that about 90% of your posts seem to be very negative.

So I guess we're even.

If people look at the number of post to see if someone is right or important, they are wrong. At best, they may look at it to see who is chatty. If they were an option to hide post count, I would certainly use it.

And, honestly, I believe the post I quoted to be way too optimistic, for the reason I exposed. I believe at the current state of the game, new cards should be few in number, and consequently have quite an impact each. Here, on the proposed form, I may test it and/or run 1-2 of them, but it's not something I would rely on in any case.

It also seem to hurt significantly more decks with relatively few master than deck with a lot, both because of Anthelios and the fact you have better odds to redraw what you have lost.

Ohlmann wrote:

If people look at the number of post to see if someone is right or important, they are wrong. At best, they may look at it to see who is chatty. If they were an option to hide post count, I would certainly use it.

And, honestly, I believe the post I quoted to be way too optimistic, for the reason I exposed. I believe at the current state of the game, new cards should be few in number, and consequently have quite an impact each. Here, on the proposed form, I may test it and/or run 1-2 of them, but it's not something I would rely on in any case.

It also seem to hurt significantly more decks with relatively few master than deck with a lot, both because of Anthelios and the fact you have better odds to redraw what you have lost.

I seldom agree with you, but i feel you are right about current gamestate.this card didnt awe me. I didnt post about it. The premise is bad, because mmpa decks dont care aboit pool damage, the gain plenty, and they recur masters with anthelios and tablets.

Seeing hands and discarding is hot. Im just not impressed by this card. Maybe runable as a one of if at all.

ReverendRevolver wrote:

I seldom agree with you, but i feel you are right about current gamestate.this card didnt awe me. I didnt post about it.

If you don't like an idea, in most cases, just don't post anything! It works for me - I don't feel the need to attack each and every idea that I dislike, unlike Mr.(Ms.?) Ohlmann.

Ohlmann continues to dodge to the question as to his(?) identity. So many posts in this forum by him, and yet I don't know who he(?) is, unlike the other frequent posters here. There is no good reason to remain anonymous in this community forum.

Why should anyone take your frequent critiques seriously at all, Ohlmann, unless we know who you are, the kind of groups you play in, and what kind of decks you've added to the TWDA? Where are your card ideas for the rest of us to tear down?

AaronC wrote:

ReverendRevolver wrote:

I seldom agree with you, but i feel you are right about current gamestate.this card didnt awe me. I didnt post about it.

If you don't like an idea, in most cases, just don't post anything! It works for me - I don't feel the need to attack each and every idea that I dislike, unlike Mr.(Ms.?) Ohlmann.

Ohlmann continues to dodge to the question as to his(?) identity. So many posts in this forum by him, and yet I don't know who he(?) is, unlike the other frequent posters here. There is no good reason to remain anonymous in this community forum.

Why should anyone take your frequent critiques seriously at all, Ohlmann, unless we know who you are, the kind of groups you play in, and what kind of decks you've added to the TWDA? Where are your card ideas for the rest of us to tear down?

For the record, im not anonomous at all, and you can find my decks in the tlda, if we had such a thing

Seriously though, ohlmann, who are you? Have we played?