Wall of Shame

Hum... we could create a "Wall of Fame" for the serious sellers/buyers. I have a very good experience with Rickstock, the Australia Idasoft its also a serious seller.

The rats usually don't stay on the e-bay for long...

wesile wrote:

Hum... we could create a "Wall of Fame" for the serious sellers/buyers. I have a very good experience with Rickstock, the Australia Idasoft its also a serious seller.

The rats usually don't stay on the e-bay for long...

Rickstock and Idasoft17 are both very reliable and I can highly recommend doing business with both of them.

Ylly wrote:

wesile wrote:

Hum... we could create a "Wall of Fame" for the serious sellers/buyers. I have a very good experience with Rickstock, the Australia Idasoft its also a serious seller.

The rats usually don't stay on the e-bay for long...

Rickstock and Idasoft17 are both very reliable and I can highly recommend doing business with both of them.

I would not say they are the best in a topic called "wall of shame". Kind of undermine the concept

wesile wrote:

Hum... we could create a "Wall of Fame" for the serious sellers/buyers.

Done the first day the site was open.

See also:
www.vekn.net/index.php/other-vtes-websites
Card Retailers and Card Merchants section

and also:
www.vekn.net/index.php/forum/12-trading-post/2-card-sellers-boxes
www.vekn.net/index.php/forum/12-trading-post/1-card-sellers-individual-cards

I personally fully support this. Hell, even giving out personal address information is important because some of these buyers will continue to practice such revolting behavior through different accounts, but will continue to stay at the same place. I'm not a regular seller or anything but EBay doesn't protect sellers. It is easier for them to ignore the sellers and not get sued by the buyers than protecting the sellers and get sued for malpractice on the buyers. One of the few tools sellers have, is cancel their accounts, and many have done so so EBay has been trying to encourage sellers to stay with them by having 'super deals and discounts' which they originally had many years ago.

I don't see why people should be against it unless you practice that yourself. There are many websites that slanders the buyers with bad behaviors, and they wouldn't continue to exist all these years if there's something wrong with it I think.

James wrote:

I don't see why people should be against it unless you practice that yourself. There are many websites that lynches out the buyers with bad behaviors, and they wouldn't continue to exist all these years if there's something wrong with it I think.

Have you ever been slandered for something you didn't do ? Because it's what happen from time to time with wall of shame : some innocent guy is slandered instead of the real culprit, either because he share the same name, out of spite, or or some other reason.

Avoiding and correcting errors on wall of shame is something very hard. That's why some people are less than thrilled by that.

(the sites you cite usually have a high percent of slander or erroneous records ; but people just don't care)