file Deck Challenge - Girls will find I'm no pushover

20 May 2011 08:43 #4574 by Pendargon
Sure, but neither will they :evil: . And sometimes, it is good enough

:QUI: :POT: :OBE: :CEL: :OBF: :tore: :assa:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 May 2011 10:49 #4575 by Juggernaut1981
One of my 'sleaziest' decks still packs a decent pile of combat and if I feel I need the fight more than the successful bleed, I stop playing stealth.

:bruj::CEL::POT::PRE::tha: Baron of Sydney, Australia, 418

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 May 2011 13:14 #4578 by Mephistopheles

Sure, but neither will they :evil: . And sometimes, it is good enough


I prefer to win. And I play combat. And Izaak said " But then why aren't combat decks so good?" And I say: combat decks are good. I think I could oust a non-combat Girls deck with my Brujah Alastor (need some minor modification).

I don't think that combat decks are weaker than any other kind of deck v:tes has to offer.

NC for Hungary

hunfragment.blogspot.com

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 May 2011 13:41 - 20 May 2011 15:37 #4579 by Izaak
Maybe they aren't.

The TWDA, however, strongly suggests they are. (*)

I feel rush/combat decks need a favorable metagame/table to perform well, whereas bleed and vote variants can function well in pretty much any environment and are therefore inherently stronger.




(*) This of course wildly depends on what you define as a combat deck. I have an AAA Alastor deck in the TWDA myself that I wouldn't qualify as a combat deck, even though it contains a bunch of red cards.
Last edit: 20 May 2011 15:37 by Izaak.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 May 2011 14:26 #4581 by Joscha
I think that combat decks are very difficult to play right. You need great mastery to make the right decisions. And even then you could miss the right point to swing the balance to your favour. That does not mean combat decks are weak. But if you want to be sure to score some VPs without great effort you'll take an easier deck.

In addition many players are scared by a combat deck so much that they often like it if it leaves the table.

I think these two points are reasons that so few combat decks win tournaments.

Baron of Frankfurt

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 May 2011 14:48 #4583 by Pendargon

Sure, but neither will they :evil: . And sometimes, it is good enough


I prefer to win. And I play combat. And Izaak said " But then why aren't combat decks so good?" And I say: combat decks are good. I think I could oust a non-combat Girls deck with my Brujah Alastor (need some minor modification).

I don't think that combat decks are weaker than any other kind of deck v:tes has to offer.


Sure. I do too. I also feel that, as a player playing with a combat deck, it is best strategy to oust them first, no matter where they sit, before they make too much pool and/or vampires for you to deal with later on.

Plus, i hate the engine on which they run on. If there is ever one change that i feel is needed to the vtes rules (and i think they are great, even the pentex and Una) is that a player can NEVER have more than 2 master phases.

:QUI: :POT: :OBE: :CEL: :OBF: :tore: :assa:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Moderators: AnkhaKraus
Time to create page: 0.111 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum