less is more... ?
18 Sep 2012 10:37 #37145
by Amenophobis
B-)
Replied by Amenophobis on topic Re: less is more... ?
And if it was copyrighted, what would be the consequence thereof, in your eyes?
Yeah, most of these are solid. But I guess its copyrighted stuffJeff Kuta 'fixed' the Group 1 vampires with the Create-A-Clan rules.
www.thelasombra.com/jeffkuta_group1.txt
B-)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 Sep 2012 11:59 #37152
by Ashur
"My strategy? Luck is my strategy, of course."
Replied by Ashur on topic Re: less is more... ?
Eh ... That the VEKN (and/or any future company behind VTES) can´t use it.
And if it was copyrighted, what would be the consequence thereof, in your eyes?
Yeah, most of these are solid. But I guess its copyrighted stuffJeff Kuta 'fixed' the Group 1 vampires with the Create-A-Clan rules.
www.thelasombra.com/jeffkuta_group1.txt
B-)
"My strategy? Luck is my strategy, of course."
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 Sep 2012 12:37 #37155
by Amenophobis
A copyright attached to a creation (IP) (program, art, source code, fiction, playing cards, etc.) doesn't automatically mean it cannot be used by others or cannot be included elsewhere.
E.g., maybe you should re-read what a creative commons license really means.
Replied by Amenophobis on topic Re: less is more... ?
I think that is a common misconception. There are various types of copyrights. There are those that are very rigid (normally used by companies), and those that are generally more fluid (normally used by creators who put things online to be used by the public).
Eh ... That the VEKN (and/or any future company behind VTES) can´t use it.
And if it was copyrighted, what would be the consequence thereof, in your eyes?
Yeah, most of these are solid. But I guess its copyrighted stuffJeff Kuta 'fixed' the Group 1 vampires with the Create-A-Clan rules.
www.thelasombra.com/jeffkuta_group1.txt
B-)
A copyright attached to a creation (IP) (program, art, source code, fiction, playing cards, etc.) doesn't automatically mean it cannot be used by others or cannot be included elsewhere.
E.g., maybe you should re-read what a creative commons license really means.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Sep 2012 05:05 - 19 Sep 2012 05:06 #37226
by Ashur
Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
No Derivative Works — You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work."
... is it that you don´t think I understand?
"My strategy? Luck is my strategy, of course."
Replied by Ashur on topic Re: less is more... ?
Well, what part of "You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work. Under the following conditions:E.g., maybe you should re-read what a creative commons license really means.
Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
No Derivative Works — You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work."
... is it that you don´t think I understand?
"My strategy? Luck is my strategy, of course."
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Sep 2012 05:47 #37232
by Whisker
Replied by Whisker on topic Re: less is more... ?
Dread Gaze
1:blood:
Only usable during a referendum.
1:blood:
Only usable during a referendum.
Thisreactingvampire gains 2 votes.
Thisreactingvampire gains 4 votes.
Hmm, don't know if 1:blood: is enough cost, as we don't want it to outshine Bewiching Oration. Mayby also reduce gained votes by 1 per level.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Sep 2012 05:52 #37234
by direwolf
Removing the word "reacting" from the text does not change that it is a reaction card, and therefore can only be used by a reacting vampire.
Dread Gaze is fine the way it is. If you want it to see more play then perhaps allowing it to be used by a tapped vampire would make it more playable.
If you want it to be usable as a modifier OR a reaction, then make a new card.
Independent Futurist. Contrarian (titled, X votes where X is the number of votes as the acting minion.) Target Vitals is always the better combat card.
Replied by direwolf on topic Re: less is more... ?
Dread Gaze
1:blood:
Only usable during a referendum.
Thisreactingvampire gains 2 votes.
Thisreactingvampire gains 4 votes.
Hmm, don't know if 1:blood: is enough cost, as we don't want it to outshine Bewiching Oration. Mayby also reduce gained votes by 1 per level.
Removing the word "reacting" from the text does not change that it is a reaction card, and therefore can only be used by a reacting vampire.
Dread Gaze is fine the way it is. If you want it to see more play then perhaps allowing it to be used by a tapped vampire would make it more playable.
If you want it to be usable as a modifier OR a reaction, then make a new card.
Independent Futurist. Contrarian (titled, X votes where X is the number of votes as the acting minion.) Target Vitals is always the better combat card.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.113 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Expansion Sets & Card Ideas
- less is more... ?