less is more... ?
19 Sep 2012 05:54 #37235
by jtroyve
from what i understand with the license, you can do anything with it, as long as you ask the creators for permission.
i actually haven't seen anyone, publicly, ask PCK's permission. i guess its because the cards aren't really ground breaking. however, a lot of people already assumed PCK would turn them down.
Replied by jtroyve on topic Re: less is more... ?
Well, what part of "You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work. Under the following conditions:E.g., maybe you should re-read what a creative commons license really means.
Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
No Derivative Works — You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work."
... is it that you don´t think I understand?
from what i understand with the license, you can do anything with it, as long as you ask the creators for permission.
i actually haven't seen anyone, publicly, ask PCK's permission. i guess its because the cards aren't really ground breaking. however, a lot of people already assumed PCK would turn them down.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Sep 2012 05:56 #37236
by Whisker
Replied by Whisker on topic Re: less is more... ?
Eyes of the Dead
Only usable when action to diablerize vampire or action to burn incapaciated Inbued is succesfull. Put this card on this reacting vampire.
[nec] This vampire gets +1 intercept against the acting minion.
[NEC] As above, but with +2 intercept.
Only usable when action to diablerize vampire or action to burn incapaciated Inbued is succesfull. Put this card on this reacting vampire.
[nec] This vampire gets +1 intercept against the acting minion.
[NEC] As above, but with +2 intercept.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Sep 2012 06:01 #37237
by Whisker
Uhh, did you notice that I added the
symbol make it a combo card?
Replied by Whisker on topic Re: less is more... ?
Removing the word "reacting" from the text does not change that it is a reaction card, and therefore can only be used by a reacting vampire.
Dread Gaze is fine the way it is. If you want it to see more play then perhaps allowing it to be used by a tapped vampire would make it more playable.
If you want it to be usable as a modifier OR a reaction, then make a new card.
Uhh, did you notice that I added the

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Sep 2012 06:04 #37239
by Juggernaut1981
Yes but PCK, by putting Creative Commons Licensing on their cards may have breached Hasbro copyright and CCP Copyright. Ignoring the idea that they may have infringed any copyright held by VEKN for creating things such as derivative works or illegal appropriations. So I don't know if this Creative Commons Copyright claimed by PCK is worth the pixels it's been recorded with. I wouldn't be comfortable with the legal status without some serious legal backing.




Baron of Sydney, Australia, 418
Replied by Juggernaut1981 on topic Re: less is more... ?
from what i understand with the license, you can do anything with it, as long as you ask the creators for permission.
i actually haven't seen anyone, publicly, ask PCK's permission. i guess its because the cards aren't really ground breaking. however, a lot of people already assumed PCK would turn them down.
Yes but PCK, by putting Creative Commons Licensing on their cards may have breached Hasbro copyright and CCP Copyright. Ignoring the idea that they may have infringed any copyright held by VEKN for creating things such as derivative works or illegal appropriations. So I don't know if this Creative Commons Copyright claimed by PCK is worth the pixels it's been recorded with. I wouldn't be comfortable with the legal status without some serious legal backing.





Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Juggernaut1981
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2376
- Thank you received: 326
20 Sep 2012 14:55 #37409
by TorranceCircle
Replied by TorranceCircle on topic Re: less is more... ?
How about making Jack of Both Sides cost 0 blood?
After discussing it in another thread, I think this might make it more playable.
Jack of Both Sides
Action
Cost: 1 blood
+2 stealth action. Requires a ready vampire.
This vampire equips or employs an equipment or retainer from your hand. The cost of that card is reduced by 1 pool or by up to 2 blood.
Artist(s): Brian LeBlanc
Set(s): Gehenna:C, Third:PTz, LotN:PG2
After discussing it in another thread, I think this might make it more playable.
Jack of Both Sides
Action
Cost: 1 blood
+2 stealth action. Requires a ready vampire.
This vampire equips or employs an equipment or retainer from your hand. The cost of that card is reduced by 1 pool or by up to 2 blood.
Artist(s): Brian LeBlanc
Set(s): Gehenna:C, Third:PTz, LotN:PG2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TorranceCircle
-
- Offline
- Methuselah
-
Less
More
- Posts: 415
- Thank you received: 58
20 Sep 2012 15:20 #37412
by Boris The Blade
Maybe some cards are just beyond rescue.
Replied by Boris The Blade on topic Re: less is more... ?
Still crapEyes of the Dead
Only usable when action to diablerize vampire or action to burn incapaciated Inbued is succesfull. Put this card on this reacting vampire.
[nec] This vampire gets +1 intercept against the acting minion.
[NEC] As above, but with +2 intercept.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Boris The Blade
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1221
- Thank you received: 256
Time to create page: 0.104 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Expansion Sets & Card Ideas
- less is more... ?