Library card redesign

Juggernaut1981 wrote:

With the HUGE number of games using a cross of some sort (red, green, white, etc) as a Life marker, there would be a clear argument to make about it being an undefended copyright.

I think it is just because they are flying under the radar.

Doesn't really matter though...

Ke. wrote:

And for the odd dual functionality cards:

....
There's only 73 of these cards out of 3700 and a good chunk of them will be covered by text like so:

....
So I don't think it's worth investing too much time in worrying about these.

Overall, i think it's bit better to keep some existing themes conceptually (like leaving reactions whiteish). Also, some bullet marks on equipment would be great.

Initially i was not really for cyan action modifier, but they should have similar color to action to keep things more intuitive.

Here are some randomish side by side comparisons:

Ke. wrote:

Here are some randomish side by side comparisons:

All are cool exept "costs 1 blood" phrase

One more thing - paragraphs between the abilities and some wording rules. So for Carlton text field should look like:

Strike: 1R

once each combat strike: dodge

+1 intercept when blocking vampires.

During your discard phase, you may burn Carlton to burn a vampire who has committed diablerie since your last turn.

Also I still think that Life, strength and bleed should be represented by icons

The are some differences in Call The Wild Hunt text.
The limitation is missing and the wording of the inferior level is slightly different.

Overall, borders are solid when it comes to Actions, Modifiers and Combat. Reaction doesn't look good. Ally looks so-so.

The cost 1 blood is missing on call of the greater beast, but it's nice to see it dropped.

Carlton should have:
Unique mortal with
2 life, 0 strength, 0 bleed.

Currently it's:
Unique mortal with 2 life, 0 strength,
0 bleed.

And it looks awful. Need to be fixed.