file BOOM! Swedish Paradox acquires White Wolf

29 Oct 2015 12:01 - 29 Oct 2015 12:23 #73912 by Ashur

"My strategy? Luck is my strategy, of course."
Last edit: 29 Oct 2015 12:23 by Ashur.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Damnans, BenPeal, D-dennis, Ankha, Migalart, cordovader

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
29 Oct 2015 12:25 #73913 by BenPeal
Before people start asking, I don't believe this has any impact on a relauch of VTES, as there's still Wizards to deal with. It might mean a new WOD-based CCG, but I have no knowledge of any such possibility.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Juggernaut1981

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
29 Oct 2015 12:31 #73914 by Ashur

Before people start asking, I don't believe this has any impact on a relauch of VTES, as there's still Wizards to deal with. It might mean a new WOD-based CCG, but I have no knowledge of any such possibility.

OK, this might be old but: What does WotC own these days that concerns VTES?

"My strategy? Luck is my strategy, of course."

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
29 Oct 2015 12:48 #73915 by BenPeal

OK, this might be old but: What does WotC own these days that concerns VTES?


The two main things are US Patent No. RE 37,957 and the Deckmaster trademark on the backs of the cards. There may be other elements - I honestly don't know - but those are the two most significant ones.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
29 Oct 2015 12:52 #73916 by Blooded Sand

OK, this might be old but: What does WotC own these days that concerns VTES?


The two main things are US Patent No. RE 37,957 and the Deckmaster trademark on the backs of the cards. There may be other elements - I honestly don't know - but those are the two most significant ones.


That patent seems to cover the idea of tapping, and the logo. So if we were to somehow find another way to mark a card as used for the turn, then we could get around that problem, correct?

The second problem is not major, as it only applies to old card print runs, and not, conceivably, any future print runs

:assa: :flight: :QUI: :OBF: :POT: :FOR: :TEM: :DOM:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
29 Oct 2015 12:52 #73917 by BenPeal

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Moderators: AnkhaKraus
Time to create page: 0.099 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum