New round structure - OPTION B - we'd like your feedback!
20 May 2018 21:28 - 20 May 2018 22:05 #87208
by elotar
NC Russia



Replied by elotar on topic New round structure - OPTION B - we'd like your feedback!
After dipping into history I think I got an understanding.
If we are going to leave SCE as is and still want to streamline the game, than we should stop lying to others and ourselves - most important phases of combat are and always was not defined in the rulebook.
So steps:
> Start of the combat
1. Start of the round
2. Manuver step
3. Grapple step
4. Strike combat ends step
5. Strike step
6. Press step
7. end of the round
> end of the combat
Or even
1 and 2 can be merged just by clarifying "before range is chosen" into meaning the same as "blocks are declined": when both players has passed at this step without playing any cards.
example:
- active player passes
- second player plays Torn Signpost, passes
- active player plays Crows
- active player plays AfB, passes
- second player got no manuevers, passes, he is sad
- active player wants to play Drawing out the Beast, but range already determined, so he can't.
- second player little less sad
6 and 7 can also be merged - you have to play Taste before second player passes.
So shorter version:
> Start of the combat
1. Manuver step
2. Grapple step
3.Strike combat ends step
4. Strike step
5. Press step
> end of the combat
Names are intuitive and I think there will be very little to explain for a new player regardless of when which card should be played as well as what to expect from VtES combat ("yes, in this game combat can suddenly end at the middle of the round"). Formal rewording is needed for 4 grapple cards, removing "strike" from SCE cards andit's all check setting range cards - they will now end the step disallowing defender to play cards.
New opportunity to design more grapple cards or to play with "step 3" somehow for those who is interested in it.
If we are going to leave SCE as is and still want to streamline the game, than we should stop lying to others and ourselves - most important phases of combat are and always was not defined in the rulebook.
So steps:
> Start of the combat
1. Start of the round
2. Manuver step
3. Grapple step
4. Strike combat ends step
5. Strike step
6. Press step
7. end of the round
> end of the combat
Or even
1 and 2 can be merged just by clarifying "before range is chosen" into meaning the same as "blocks are declined": when both players has passed at this step without playing any cards.
example:
- active player passes
- second player plays Torn Signpost, passes
- active player plays Crows
- active player plays AfB, passes
- second player got no manuevers, passes, he is sad
- active player wants to play Drawing out the Beast, but range already determined, so he can't.
- second player little less sad
6 and 7 can also be merged - you have to play Taste before second player passes.
So shorter version:
> Start of the combat
1. Manuver step
2. Grapple step
3.
4. Strike step
5. Press step
> end of the combat
Names are intuitive and I think there will be very little to explain for a new player regardless of when which card should be played as well as what to expect from VtES combat ("yes, in this game combat can suddenly end at the middle of the round"). Formal rewording is needed for 4 grapple cards, removing "strike" from SCE cards and
New opportunity to design more grapple cards or to play with "step 3" somehow for those who is interested in it.





Last edit: 20 May 2018 22:05 by elotar.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 May 2018 07:02 - 21 May 2018 07:20 #87210
by Kraus
In option B there is really no reason to merge phases and then invent a new one, when all grapples can easily be specified in card text when they're played. Immortal Grapple is the only grapple anyways where the timing is wonky.
It was already suggested that IG would read "If the range is close--" etc. It nerfs it a bit, but that's trivial.
As was stated, worrying about single cards like IG, is moot in this discussion. As should the power level of S:CE be as well.
Anyways, if your idea is that S:CE is too strong and it should be trumped with Grapples, cards like Psyche!, Telepathic Tracking, Death Seeker and the new
card are better in killing Majesty decks. All IG is better at than those is that it enables Disarm. Which can be done on
as well, so...
Grapple isn't necessary to battle S:CE. A new step in the combat outline should not be added on a basis of any card's power level anyways.
In option A I could imagine a Grapple step being fine, and should probably be suggested in that thread. All grapples should then be errated to be played in that step for it to serve a purpose. And then there could be more grapple cards designed, and grapple support cards and vampires.
"Oh, to the Hades with the manners! He's a complete bastard, and calling him that insults bastards everywhere!"
-Nalia De-Arnise
garourimgazette.wordpress.com/
www.vekn.net/forum-guidelines
Replied by Kraus on topic New round structure - OPTION B - we'd like your feedback!
While this is a cool design space that should get more help (maybe vampires that play grapples better), it's really more along the lines of option A.New opportunity to design more grapple cards or to play with "step 3" somehow for those who is interested in it.
In option B there is really no reason to merge phases and then invent a new one, when all grapples can easily be specified in card text when they're played. Immortal Grapple is the only grapple anyways where the timing is wonky.
It was already suggested that IG would read "If the range is close--" etc. It nerfs it a bit, but that's trivial.
As was stated, worrying about single cards like IG, is moot in this discussion. As should the power level of S:CE be as well.
Anyways, if your idea is that S:CE is too strong and it should be trumped with Grapples, cards like Psyche!, Telepathic Tracking, Death Seeker and the new


Grapple isn't necessary to battle S:CE. A new step in the combat outline should not be added on a basis of any card's power level anyways.
In option A I could imagine a Grapple step being fine, and should probably be suggested in that thread. All grapples should then be errated to be played in that step for it to serve a purpose. And then there could be more grapple cards designed, and grapple support cards and vampires.
"Oh, to the Hades with the manners! He's a complete bastard, and calling him that insults bastards everywhere!"
-Nalia De-Arnise
garourimgazette.wordpress.com/
www.vekn.net/forum-guidelines
Last edit: 21 May 2018 07:20 by Kraus.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 May 2018 07:55 #87211
by Bloodartist
A heretic is a man who sees with his own eyes.
—Gotthold Ephraim Lessing
Replied by Bloodartist on topic New round structure - OPTION B - we'd like your feedback!
I'm not a fan of introducing a new step in combat just because of one card. There must be a way to errata IG in some way that works with whatever combat structure we choose.
A heretic is a man who sees with his own eyes.
—Gotthold Ephraim Lessing
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bloodartist
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 968
- Thank you received: 166
21 May 2018 08:18 #87212
by drnlmza
What's unique about Immortal Grapple's timing?
There are other cards played after range is determined, but before strikes are chosen, including
Thin Blood
Blood of Acid
Superior King of the Mountain
inf Blissful Agony
--
National Coordinator
South Africa
Replied by drnlmza on topic New round structure - OPTION B - we'd like your feedback!
I'm not a fan of introducing a new step in combat just because of one card. There must be a way to errata IG in some way that works with whatever combat structure we choose.
What's unique about Immortal Grapple's timing?
There are other cards played after range is determined, but before strikes are chosen, including
Thin Blood
Blood of Acid
Superior King of the Mountain
inf Blissful Agony
--
National Coordinator
South Africa
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 May 2018 08:45 #87213
by elotar
We are not introducing new step, it was there all along from the beginning. We just fixing it in the rules.
Situation, that whole combat of VtES are greatly influenced by one card is stupid, I've written a lot about it. But if we want to IG remain working as is, which we should do until SCE remains as is, than we have no other way -> range should be determined, than players should ask if anybody is playing IG.
NC Russia



Replied by elotar on topic New round structure - OPTION B - we'd like your feedback!
I'm not a fan of introducing a new step in combat just because of one card. There must be a way to errata IG in some way that works with whatever combat structure we choose.
We are not introducing new step, it was there all along from the beginning. We just fixing it in the rules.
Situation, that whole combat of VtES are greatly influenced by one card is stupid, I've written a lot about it. But if we want to IG remain working as is, which we should do until SCE remains as is, than we have no other way -> range should be determined, than players should ask if anybody is playing IG.





Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 May 2018 09:16 #87215
by elotar
O, thanks! Grapple step became much less empty!
NC Russia



Replied by elotar on topic New round structure - OPTION B - we'd like your feedback!
Thin Blood
Blood of Acid
Superior King of the Mountain
inf Blissful Agony
O, thanks! Grapple step became much less empty!





Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.188 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Rules Questions
- New round structure - OPTION B - we'd like your feedback!