On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".
29 Nov 2011 16:37 #16462
by bakija
"More frequently played as a vote deck" does not equal "Results in more titled vampires showing up in randomly seated games".
Again, yes, Camarilla vote decks are better than non Camarilla Vote decks. Mostly 'cause of Parity Shift. But this doesn't mean that in any given, randomly seated game there will be more Camarilla titles at the table than non Camarilla titles. As titled vampires of all sects show up all the time, even when no Political Actions are used. Magaji show up all the time in non vote decks. 'Cause no Secrets from the Magaji is incredibly good. Cardinals and Arch Bishops show up all the time in blocky-decks, 'cause Eternal Vigilance is incredibly good. Prisci show up all the time, as Prisci tend to be moderately sized vampires with good disciplines anyway. People use titled vampires in non vote based decks all the time. As having some titled vampires on the table, even if you have no political actions whatsoever, is often a good idea.
Saying "Camarilla vote decks are better than non Camarilla vote decks, so they will be at the table with your Sabbat vote deck which will then benefit from Private Audience (or whichever) more" is not something that holds in a game where decks and seating are essentially random. As you are probably more likely to sit at a table with zero vote decks as you are to sit at a table with multiple vote decks. As the decks that people are using and what is at a given table is, generally speaking, random.
Replied by bakija on topic Re: On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".
Except that IF the Camarilla is better, it will be more frequently played.
"More frequently played as a vote deck" does not equal "Results in more titled vampires showing up in randomly seated games".
Again, yes, Camarilla vote decks are better than non Camarilla Vote decks. Mostly 'cause of Parity Shift. But this doesn't mean that in any given, randomly seated game there will be more Camarilla titles at the table than non Camarilla titles. As titled vampires of all sects show up all the time, even when no Political Actions are used. Magaji show up all the time in non vote decks. 'Cause no Secrets from the Magaji is incredibly good. Cardinals and Arch Bishops show up all the time in blocky-decks, 'cause Eternal Vigilance is incredibly good. Prisci show up all the time, as Prisci tend to be moderately sized vampires with good disciplines anyway. People use titled vampires in non vote based decks all the time. As having some titled vampires on the table, even if you have no political actions whatsoever, is often a good idea.
Saying "Camarilla vote decks are better than non Camarilla vote decks, so they will be at the table with your Sabbat vote deck which will then benefit from Private Audience (or whichever) more" is not something that holds in a game where decks and seating are essentially random. As you are probably more likely to sit at a table with zero vote decks as you are to sit at a table with multiple vote decks. As the decks that people are using and what is at a given table is, generally speaking, random.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Lech
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
29 Nov 2011 17:42 #16469
by Jeff Kuta
When you are anvil, be patient; when a hammer, strike.
pckvtes.wordpress.com
@pckvtes
Replied by Jeff Kuta on topic Re: On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".
Private Audience is strictly worse than Closed Session.
Private Audience can be better than Closed Session in certain metagames.
Private Audience can be better than Closed Session in certain metagames.
When you are anvil, be patient; when a hammer, strike.
pckvtes.wordpress.com
@pckvtes
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
29 Nov 2011 18:02 #16476
by Suoli
That's some funky kind of moon logic. Might as well say that I have equal chances of drawing the single copy of Giant's Blood and one of the 4 copies of Villein out of a 90-card deck because the deck is randomized.
Replied by Suoli on topic Re: On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".
Except that IF the Camarilla is better, it will be more frequently played.
"More frequently played as a vote deck" does not equal "Results in more titled vampires showing up in randomly seated games".
Again, yes, Camarilla vote decks are better than non Camarilla Vote decks. Mostly 'cause of Parity Shift. But this doesn't mean that in any given, randomly seated game there will be more Camarilla titles at the table than non Camarilla titles. As titled vampires of all sects show up all the time, even when no Political Actions are used. Magaji show up all the time in non vote decks. 'Cause no Secrets from the Magaji is incredibly good. Cardinals and Arch Bishops show up all the time in blocky-decks, 'cause Eternal Vigilance is incredibly good. Prisci show up all the time, as Prisci tend to be moderately sized vampires with good disciplines anyway. People use titled vampires in non vote based decks all the time. As having some titled vampires on the table, even if you have no political actions whatsoever, is often a good idea.
Saying "Camarilla vote decks are better than non Camarilla vote decks, so they will be at the table with your Sabbat vote deck which will then benefit from Private Audience (or whichever) more" is not something that holds in a game where decks and seating are essentially random. As you are probably more likely to sit at a table with zero vote decks as you are to sit at a table with multiple vote decks. As the decks that people are using and what is at a given table is, generally speaking, random.
That's some funky kind of moon logic. Might as well say that I have equal chances of drawing the single copy of Giant's Blood and one of the 4 copies of Villein out of a 90-card deck because the deck is randomized.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
29 Nov 2011 21:27 #16493
by bakija
Not really.
What decks you sit down at a table with is, essentially, random. If you are a Camarilla vote deck, you are just as likely to see non Camarilla titled vampires on the table as you are Camarilla titled vampires. 'Cause titled vampires show up in decks that aren't vote decks. All the time.
Just because Camarilla vampires make better vote decks than non Camarilla vampires doesn't mean that, among all deck types, Camarilla titled vampires will show up more often. As not all decks are vote decks. And titled vampires frequently show up in non vote decks.
Replied by bakija on topic Re: On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".
That's some funky kind of moon logic. Might as well say that I have equal chances of drawing the single copy of Giant's Blood and one of the 4 copies of Villein out of a 90-card deck because the deck is randomized.
Not really.
What decks you sit down at a table with is, essentially, random. If you are a Camarilla vote deck, you are just as likely to see non Camarilla titled vampires on the table as you are Camarilla titled vampires. 'Cause titled vampires show up in decks that aren't vote decks. All the time.
Just because Camarilla vampires make better vote decks than non Camarilla vampires doesn't mean that, among all deck types, Camarilla titled vampires will show up more often. As not all decks are vote decks. And titled vampires frequently show up in non vote decks.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
29 Nov 2011 22:16 - 29 Nov 2011 22:27 #16496
by Suoli
Random is not the same as perfectly even probability distribution. Random seating does not mean that you are equally likely to see deck A and deck B. Certain decks are more likely to show up than others. That's just a plain fact. This is why you've probably played against a Triple A deck a few times more often than an Eyes of the Dead deck.
Replied by Suoli on topic Re: On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".
That's some funky kind of moon logic. Might as well say that I have equal chances of drawing the single copy of Giant's Blood and one of the 4 copies of Villein out of a 90-card deck because the deck is randomized.
Not really.
What decks you sit down at a table with is, essentially, random. If you are a Camarilla vote deck, you are just as likely to see non Camarilla titled vampires on the table as you are Camarilla titled vampires. 'Cause titled vampires show up in decks that aren't vote decks. All the time.
Just because Camarilla vampires make better vote decks than non Camarilla vampires doesn't mean that, among all deck types, Camarilla titled vampires will show up more often. As not all decks are vote decks. And titled vampires frequently show up in non vote decks.
Random is not the same as perfectly even probability distribution. Random seating does not mean that you are equally likely to see deck A and deck B. Certain decks are more likely to show up than others. That's just a plain fact. This is why you've probably played against a Triple A deck a few times more often than an Eyes of the Dead deck.
Last edit: 29 Nov 2011 22:27 by Suoli.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
29 Nov 2011 22:33 #16497
by KevinM
Kevin M., Prince of Las Vegas
"Know your enemy and know yourself; in one-thousand battles
you shall never be in peril." -- Sun Tzu, *The Art of War*
"Contentment...Complacency...Catastrophe!" -- Joseph Chevalier
Please visit VTESville daily! vtesville.myminicity.com/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/groups/129744447064017
Replied by KevinM on topic Re: On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".
This is empirically untrue. One sees FAR more Camarilla titled vampires than non-Camarilla titled vampires. Even after a Sabbat set was printed, one always saw more Camarilla titled vampires showing up, partly because they have historically, if not still are, just better vampires from better clans and partly because of cards like 2nd Tradition and Parity Shift.What decks you sit down at a table with is, essentially, random. If you are a Camarilla vote deck, you are just as likely to see non Camarilla titled vampires on the table as you are Camarilla titled vampires.
Kevin M., Prince of Las Vegas
"Know your enemy and know yourself; in one-thousand battles
you shall never be in peril." -- Sun Tzu, *The Art of War*
"Contentment...Complacency...Catastrophe!" -- Joseph Chevalier
Please visit VTESville daily! vtesville.myminicity.com/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/groups/129744447064017
The following user(s) said Thank You: Brum
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.125 seconds
- You are here:
- Home
- Forum
- V:TES Discussion
- Card Balance & Strategy Discussion
- On Parity Shift 6. "problematic card".