Rules Team Rulings 02-DEC-11
09 Dec 2011 11:36 #17800
by Amenophobis
Replied by Amenophobis on topic Re: Rules Team Rulings 02-DEC-11
Or just "2 votes (T)." B)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Amenophobis
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1776
- Thank you received: 119
09 Dec 2011 11:55 #17805
by henrik
This would be better for the independent vampires.
If the "Titled" was explicitly printed on independent vampires and not on the sabbat/camarilla/laibon/anarch vampires with titles I think it would cause confusion anyway. And to type out "Titled." on all titled camarilla/sabbat/laibon/anarch vampires would require more space than the current way. Might still be worth it though.
Which would require people to check the rules for what "(T)" means, instead of checking the rules for whether "has x votes" is considered a title. So if the current problem is that "has x votes" is only defined as a title in the rulebook, that problem would still persist.
Replied by henrik on topic Re: Rules Team Rulings 02-DEC-11
Replace "Ur-Shulgi has 2 votes" with "Titled. 2 votes."
Who else should have two votes except this vampire?
This would be better for the independent vampires.
If the "Titled" was explicitly printed on independent vampires and not on the sabbat/camarilla/laibon/anarch vampires with titles I think it would cause confusion anyway. And to type out "Titled." on all titled camarilla/sabbat/laibon/anarch vampires would require more space than the current way. Might still be worth it though.
Or just "2 votes (T)." B)
Which would require people to check the rules for what "(T)" means, instead of checking the rules for whether "has x votes" is considered a title. So if the current problem is that "has x votes" is only defined as a title in the rulebook, that problem would still persist.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
09 Dec 2011 13:18 #17824
by Ankha
But if there's space, I prefer "Independant. 2 votes (titled).
Replied by Ankha on topic Re: Rules Team Rulings 02-DEC-11
Do people check for what R means in 2R damage once they encountered this kind of cardtext?
Or just "2 votes (T)." B)
Which would require people to check the rules for what "(T)" means, instead of checking the rules for whether "has x votes" is considered a title. So if the current problem is that "has x votes" is only defined as a title in the rulebook, that problem would still persist.
But if there's space, I prefer "Independant. 2 votes (titled).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
09 Dec 2011 13:24 #17827
by henrik
The first time I guess they do, and after that I guess they remember it. Just like with "x votes". First time you encounter it (and wonders if it is a title) you look it up in the rules, after that you remember it.
I do agree that the part about "x votes" being a title could be stated on a better place in the rulebook though.
Replied by henrik on topic Re: Rules Team Rulings 02-DEC-11
Do people check for what R means in 2R damage once they encountered this kind of cardtext?
But if there's space, I prefer "Independant. 2 votes (titled).
The first time I guess they do, and after that I guess they remember it. Just like with "x votes". First time you encounter it (and wonders if it is a title) you look it up in the rules, after that you remember it.
I do agree that the part about "x votes" being a title could be stated on a better place in the rulebook though.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
02 Jan 2012 00:44 #19705
by Pascal Bertrand
Other examples: Strix, Major Boon.
Replied by Pascal Bertrand on topic Re: Rules Team Rulings 02-DEC-11
- Wording of “successfully [bleeds]”:
When appropriate, this has been replaced with “when [..] would successfully [bleed]”. Examples are Andre LeRoux, superior Spying Mission, Dis Pater.
Other examples: Strix, Major Boon.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Pascal Bertrand
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4268
- Thank you received: 1186
10 Mar 2012 16:10 - 10 Mar 2012 16:13 #25514
by extrala
Replied by extrala on topic Re: Rules Team Rulings 02-DEC-11
Shouldn't these changes be included into the respective areas, i.e. the changes to the tournament rules to the
VEKN tournament section
? That page still lists the now-outdated rules for the 2011 tournament season.
Or in other words: Can somebody please do it!
Plus it would be nice to have the whole VEKN tournament rules as PDF, not just the individual sections.
Or in other words: Can somebody please do it!
Plus it would be nice to have the whole VEKN tournament rules as PDF, not just the individual sections.
Last edit: 10 Mar 2012 16:13 by extrala.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Pascal Bertrand, Angel74
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.158 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Rules Questions
- Rules Team Rulings 02-DEC-11