Extending the "Any" Grouping. Thoughts ?
12 Oct 2012 12:11 #38980
by Reyda
Imagination is our only weapon in the war against reality -Jules de Gaultier
Replied by Reyda on topic Re: Extending the "Any" Grouping. Thoughts ?
Nothing prevents future imbued to be printed with the "any" grouping though.
and I also always wondered why there was never a "promo" imbued with a special that can also benefit vampire decks (a bit like miss Tremblay) printed so far. Claudio severino is nice but very specific... :/
So any other thoughts on the non unique vampires becoming "any" grouping ?
I have the strange feeling that it can bring some fresh ideas to the now static metagame.
Beside this, it's not against the storyline ...
and I also always wondered why there was never a "promo" imbued with a special that can also benefit vampire decks (a bit like miss Tremblay) printed so far. Claudio severino is nice but very specific... :/
So any other thoughts on the non unique vampires becoming "any" grouping ?
I have the strange feeling that it can bring some fresh ideas to the now static metagame.
Beside this, it's not against the storyline ...
Imagination is our only weapon in the war against reality -Jules de Gaultier
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 Oct 2012 18:58 #39044
by Haze
Replied by Haze on topic Re: Extending the "Any" Grouping. Thoughts ?
Dan Murdock should be group ANY
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 Oct 2012 20:32 #39051
by Boris The Blade
Replied by Boris The Blade on topic Re: Extending the "Any" Grouping. Thoughts ?
And that wouldn't even take an erratum since it's not written on the cardDan Murdock should be group ANY

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Boris The Blade
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1221
- Thank you received: 256
13 Oct 2012 22:19 #39053
by Reyda
Imagination is our only weapon in the war against reality -Jules de Gaultier
Replied by Reyda on topic Re: Extending the "Any" Grouping. Thoughts ?
correct me if i'm wrong but it's not written on GR1 vampires either

Imagination is our only weapon in the war against reality -Jules de Gaultier
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
14 Oct 2012 03:56 #39059
by LunaSlave
Replied by LunaSlave on topic Re: Extending the "Any" Grouping. Thoughts ?
I'd be in favor of doing it for the Fidai, all of the Imbued, and Angelo. Nothing else, though! The Horde and Tupdogs might create too many problems elsewhere and the Aabbt Kindred really should stick with Nefertiti.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
14 Oct 2012 13:30 #39083
by Reyda
Can you please explain me your rational argumentation about this ? :/
and for your information, the thread started with "non unique vampires".
Imbued are seldom played with vampires, so I can't see how the "any grouping" would benefit them, except it may help a weenie potence gr1-2 to have tremblay for extra bleed...
And for Angelo : I'd like to point that he is perfectly playble where he is, his grouping allowing him to be played with 3 different circles already. If you make him "any grouping", odds are he will not benefit blood brothers but merely become another crypt filler for CEL/FOR decks. Which would just trump the purpose of this "any grouping" change proposal for non-unique, i repeat, non-unique vampires.
The point is not " Let's make what I want and phoque the rest, and by the way I need angelo there".
It's a change in the game to say " Non unique vampires are thematically groupless so they can fit in other groupings and allow the blooming of new strategies".
Sorry if I look a little rude, I assure you that in real life I'm the coolest guy I know(TM)
Imagination is our only weapon in the war against reality -Jules de Gaultier
Replied by Reyda on topic Re: Extending the "Any" Grouping. Thoughts ?
but, how could you be sure that Fida'i would cause no problem, but the Hordes or the grotesques would ?I'd be in favor of doing it for the Fidai, all of the Imbued, and Angelo. Nothing else, though! The Horde and Tupdogs might create too many problems elsewhere and the Aabbt Kindred really should stick with Nefertiti.
Can you please explain me your rational argumentation about this ? :/
and for your information, the thread started with "non unique vampires".
Imbued are seldom played with vampires, so I can't see how the "any grouping" would benefit them, except it may help a weenie potence gr1-2 to have tremblay for extra bleed...
And for Angelo : I'd like to point that he is perfectly playble where he is, his grouping allowing him to be played with 3 different circles already. If you make him "any grouping", odds are he will not benefit blood brothers but merely become another crypt filler for CEL/FOR decks. Which would just trump the purpose of this "any grouping" change proposal for non-unique, i repeat, non-unique vampires.
The point is not " Let's make what I want and phoque the rest, and by the way I need angelo there".
It's a change in the game to say " Non unique vampires are thematically groupless so they can fit in other groupings and allow the blooming of new strategies".
Sorry if I look a little rude, I assure you that in real life I'm the coolest guy I know(TM)

Imagination is our only weapon in the war against reality -Jules de Gaultier
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.105 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Generic V:TES Discussion
- Extending the "Any" Grouping. Thoughts ?