Extending the "Any" Grouping. Thoughts ?

Grouping Hordes with Cybele would be a mess, so no I don't think Hordes should be "any" group.

Angelo should probably be "any", yes.

ReverendRevolver wrote:

tupog should stay at its grouping

Why? I don't think that allowing them in a deck together with Fustuk would wreck the balance of the game. And other than that, I don't see anything major that would make the classic Tupdog deck much better in Groups 1 or 5-6. Sure, they make nice Crypt thinners, but that wouldn't break Groups 1 or 5-6, either.

Izaak wrote:

Grouping Hordes with Cybele would be a mess, so no I don't think Hordes should be "any" group.

Would the addition of Hordes result in a better Girls Will Find deck? I mean, I can see that Tend the Flocking two free Hordes with Cybele in one turn is kinda obnoxious, but to make that happen reliably the crypt would need to be basically just 5xCybele, 7xHorde and I'm not sure that would be very optimal.

Or N hordes, one cybele and one Anson with plenty of recruitments...
You could add parthelius...

Just let it be...

IMHO Angelo should be able to play cards for the other blood brothers as well...

Anson and Cybele can't be in the same deck together...

Non-existant user wrote:

The Imbued could also be ANY (if not NONE ): why allow Beatrice with Germaine but not with Beast?

Noooo! Then that might preclude a future G2 or G6 Imbued release! And then where'd we be?