Abolish Grouping Rule

seems like much better decks could be made.

hope i'm positing in the right place.

Very much disagree!

Grouping rule is one of the most balancing rules in the entire game.

It would be helpful if you offered some justification for your suggestion. Why on earth would we want to abolish grouping?

DeathInABottle wrote:

It would be helpful if you offered some justification for your suggestion. Why on earth would we want to abolish grouping?

Because he's a young player which doesn't have a firm grasp on the game and do not know the history of the rule.

And if I wanted to be truly hateful, I would add that he don't take the time to understand what people say to him.

please share with us young players the history of the rule.

I have to say I've never felt the grouping those was bad, just that more balance needed to come in later vamps. democratus sucks, Lucinde is great and maryanne is awesome. on the flipside Euro bru and Anson celerity guns are way better than similar decks of later grouping. the biggest complaints i have are than only g2 gargoyles are playable as independent, no malkavians since Roxanne have big fortitude, there needs to be bloodlines vamps that churn out allies efficiently (abomination fir wolves and nagaraja for wraith) and g2-3 tzimitze are WAY better than recent ones.

I think g2 is great and all groups should have that level of good vamps, and allgroups should have MORE crypt cards, like g2 and 4, maybe with imbued who differ in function on an individual level from the g4 ones oneach even number set.

insummary , I think Ben and the DT can make every bad thing about grouping vanish if they put thier minds to it.