Abolish Grouping Rule

To be honest with you, most of the vamps I own I had to buy or trade for to use in decks. there are still vamps I love that I can't build decks around because of how much they cost. (Matthias, Blanche, Lord Ashton, basic Beckett, and many others). but if you want to up your collection, rickstock has amazing deals inhis eBay store. sometimes he auctions sets of all of a small set, or all of a clan in a big set and they finish for nearly nothing. also, many vamps from group 2 (AH, FN, DS, S, SW, BL) ate $1 for 4-10 copies in many cases most of the g2 !ventrue are that cheap, except beefcake, Vanessa, and Gerard, if I recall. same with support vamps like zoe.
I had limited cards when I started, and it sucks if you have noone to trade with or borrow from. but its a fun game,, made more fun with more crypt options.

grouping is needed. maybe not for non unique, but the rule needs to be there.

@Mirrdes
All this will do is amplify the "Seating Ro-Sham-Bo" of VTES. You get the wrong prey or pred and it really will just be all over for you.

Weenie DEM
Weenie DOM
Weenie PRE
Weenie AUS
Weenie ANI
Weenie POT

These decks are ALREADY doing well in tournaments, and you'd like to ensure that they can ALL have superior disciplines? There would be little point playing something other than a Weenie-Mono-discipline deck.

mirddes wrote:

for me the appeal of no grouping is that i have few cards.

mirddes wrote:

crypt cards are extremely cheap

the strength of mono weenie would be offset by everything else


even disiplineless would see gains

Huitzilopochtli and Cybele together would worry me a bit, lol. And Rafaele, Fanchion, Leandro, Arika together would be insane too.

Wow, I could finally do my Rafael+Alexandra+Flurry+Aching Beauty deck that I wanted to build so badly!
Oh wait ...